The minimum wage debate is a staple in discussions about economic policy. While proponents of wage hikes argue they’re essential for a fairer economy, the actual mechanics of wage determination are far more nuanced. When we pull back the curtain, it’s clear that setting wages involves a blend of economic forces, business realities, and societal expectations. This is especially relevant in Vermont, where high operating costs and a unique economic landscape add additional layers to the conversation.
Supply and Demand: The Starting Point
Wages, like most prices, are largely governed by supply and demand. If a certain skill is in high demand but in short supply, wages for that skill naturally rise as businesses compete to attract talent. Conversely, when there’s an oversupply of workers, wages may stagnate or decrease. This basic principle helps explain wage disparities across industries and locations. It’s one reason high-skill fields like engineering and medicine command such high salaries—they require specialized knowledge that’s not easily acquired.
For more on wage statistics, visit the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Vermont Department of Labor.
Skill Level and Experience Matter
Beyond supply and demand, wages also reflect the skill level and experience of the employee. A highly skilled engineer or seasoned doctor justifies a higher wage due to their training and the value they bring. But this isn’t just true for high-skill fields. Even among entry-level positions, differences in experience and dedication can make a huge difference. For instance, does it make sense for a hardworking single mother balancing college and a job to be paid the same minimum wage as a gamer who reluctantly shows up to work because his parents insist? This comparison highlights one of the inherent shortcomings of one-size-fits-all minimum wage laws, where vastly different levels of commitment and productivity are rewarded equally.
The Cost of Doing Business
Often overlooked in wage debates is the true cost of running a business. For every dollar an employer pays in wages, additional government-mandated expenses come into play, which can double or even triple the cost. Employers are required to contribute to Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation, not to mention optional benefits like health insurance or retirement plans. So, while an employee might receive $15 an hour, the business’s actual cost could easily be closer to $30 an hour.
These added expenses hit small businesses particularly hard, making it difficult to expand, hire more staff, or even stay afloat. Larger companies may be better equipped to absorb these costs, but small businesses, which often operate on thinner margins, feel the squeeze. When minimum wage increases are mandated, these businesses must figure out how to manage the increased costs, which sometimes means cutting hours, reducing staff, or raising prices—decisions that can ultimately hurt the very workers the policy aims to help. For more insights into the challenges facing small businesses, check resources from the U.S. Small Business Administration or the National Federation of Independent Business.
The Irony of Minimum and Maximum Wage Laws
While minimum wage laws are framed as a means to protect workers, they also raise an intriguing question: if wage fairness is such a priority, why hasn’t anyone proposed a maximum wage law? Couldn’t we, theoretically, cap executive earnings to address wage inequality from the top down? Of course, such an idea would be met with widespread backlash, as it’s perceived as an infringement on individual achievement and ambition. Yet minimum wage laws, which similarly interfere with market-driven wage negotiations, don’t receive the same level of scrutiny.
It’s a curious double standard. After all, both minimum and maximum wage laws impose government control on wages, but only one is widely accepted. For businesses, especially smaller ones, minimum wage hikes without corresponding tax relief or operational support can feel like punishment for simply trying to operate within a free market system.
The Living Wage Paradox: What About the Self-Employed?
Then there’s the concept of a “living wage”—a figure that goes beyond minimum wage to ensure a basic standard of living. According to MIT’s Living Wage Calculator, this wage varies widely based on regional factors and cost of living. Living wage proposals, though well-meaning, are almost exclusively applied to employer-employee relationships, overlooking those who are self-employed. Farmers, small business owners, and independent contractors often work long hours with little financial reward, yet they’re left out of most living wage discussions.
Consider the average Vermont farmer: many work from dawn till dusk, battling unpredictable markets and weather, only to take home far less than a “living wage.” If we’re serious about wage fairness, shouldn’t these self-employed individuals receive a subsidy to ensure they meet this threshold? Of course, such an idea is impractical. Guaranteeing a livable income for every self-employed person would place an untenable burden on government resources. It’s simply easier, and politically more convenient, to target employers—particularly large corporations—as the “bad guys” in wage debates.
This focus on business owners as the culprits behind low wages glosses over the fact that many small business owners face their own financial struggles. Unlike large companies, they don’t have deep pockets to cover wage hikes or the luxury of hiring teams of accountants to manage payroll complexities. The conversation around minimum wage could benefit from a broader understanding that the needs of workers, employers, and self-employed individuals don’t always align—and that blanket policies often ignore this reality.
A Call for Pragmatic Solutions
As Vermont considers its economic future, it might be time to rethink how we approach wage policies. Minimum wage laws, though popular, can limit entry-level opportunities and discourage businesses from hiring. Rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, we could consider targeted incentives for businesses that create high-quality jobs, support for skills training, and a focus on reducing operational costs for small businesses. These measures could help Vermont businesses flourish and workers thrive, without burdening either group with rigid mandates.
Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Wage Policy
The complexities of wage determination reveal that setting minimum wages is only one piece of the puzzle. Operating costs, government mandates, and differences in skill and dedication all play significant roles in shaping a fair and functional wage system. Minimum wage laws may aim to protect workers, but they also impose additional challenges on businesses, particularly smaller ones. Meanwhile, the notion of a “living wage” could apply to self-employed individuals, yet that reality is seldom addressed, leaving many of Vermont’s hardworking farmers and independent workers out of the conversation.
Rather than a rigid set of wage requirements, a balanced approach that considers both business realities and worker needs could help Vermont foster a resilient, prosperous economy. Perhaps it’s time to move beyond slogans and consider policies that support the growth of opportunity without sacrificing the stability of the very businesses that sustain Vermont’s communities.
Dave Soulia | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram
#fyivt #MinimumWage #VermontEconomy #SmallBusiness
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Leave a Reply