Lawmakers debated tax, transportation fees, forestry exemptions and reporting mandates across multiple committee hearings
Senate and House committees on May 14 reviewed multiple bills and amendments addressing taxes and tax administration, a proposed mileage-based road usage charge, forestry and current-use exemptions for agriculture and forestry, and changes to reporting requirements for health programs and recovery services. Committees discussed changes to appeals, credits and transition arrangements, fiscal impacts and regulatory authority across those measures.
Senate Finance (16:00)
Senate Finance reviewed amendments related to Act 73 and several tax administration provisions. A new Senate section 4A would let a single owner or a forester acting for an owner sign a forest management plan for current use instead of requiring signatures from all owners. The amendment would also extend the property valuation objection appeal period made to the Property Valuation and Review division (PVR) from 14 days to 30 days, citing mail delays as a rationale. The Senate draft would repeal a grand list contents change enacted in Act 73; staff noted this repeal overlaps with replacement language elsewhere.
The committee also discussed clarifying language in a mapping-related provision stating PVR will not value certain broadcasting properties as used solely for broadcasting. Senators reviewed changes to a Downtown Village Center tax credit, noting the Senate increased the credit amount to $500,000 and that Burlington may retain 75% of the state education tax increment and 100% of the municipal tax increment for a waterfront tax increment financing area. The Burlington provision would require submission of an updated tax increment financing plan on 11/15/2029, and legislative counsel said the language largely reflects current law rather than making substantive changes.
Members flagged technical drafting issues addressed in collaboration with the Tax Department and committee staff, and discussed scheduling follow-up work on remaining differences between the Senate and House versions of the measures.
House Ways & Means — S.35 and mileage-based user fee (14:55)
House Ways & Means considered S.35 and extensive changes the Senate made to the House bill on a mileage-based user fee, described variously as a mileage-in-lieu-of-fuel tax or road usage charge. Office of Legislative Council and Joint Fiscal Office staff walked the committee through the Senate’s expanded draft and a fiscal note.
Under the Senate construct, the mileage-based program would require a plan that adds payment options and methods to account for out-of-state miles, establishes fuel tax credits for vehicles using gasoline or diesel, and analyzes differentiated charges by fuel type, weight and vehicle size. The plan must incorporate hybrids and efficient vehicles by 2029 and light duty vehicles by 2031 and evaluate options for medium and heavy electric vehicles. The committee was told three reports are required, including an initial plan due next January that would include recommendations on retaining or repealing a flat rate.
Transition provisions were a focus. The Senate’s transition applies to both newly registered and previously registered vehicles. Vehicles registered in 2027 or 2028 would be assessed a flat road usage charge of $89 for a one-year registration or $178 for two years, with that amount applied as a credit against the first mileage-based fee. The provision aims to address initial revenue gaps by charging and crediting a flat fee during early reporting periods.
Ways & Means discussed payment options for newly registered vehicles — pay-as-you-go, estimated payments with a true-up, or a flat-rate option — and noted scenarios where the flat-rate option could delay revenue collection until later fiscal years. Staff pointed out potential forecasting complications from varied payment timing and flagged an option under the Senate draft that would assess a default or cap rate for failure to report mileage; the default could be $178 under the Senate language and rise to higher rates under other constructs. The Senate removed interest on unpaid amounts that had appeared in the House version, relying instead on a default rate and registration denial as enforcement mechanisms. The session also noted that the EV infrastructure fee for battery electric vehicles would be eliminated, with existing fees for plug-in hybrids redirected to the T Fund.
Senate Finance (13:00) — H.932 and forestry/current-use changes
Senate Finance convened earlier to consider H.932 and a package of amendments defining and clarifying forestry and agricultural exemptions from Act 250-like review. Committee staff said the draft would codify existing practice that logging and forestry activities below 2,500 feet elevation that do not conflict with permit conditions do not require permit amendments. When development is proposed on a parcel that includes exempt forestry activity, only the portions of the parcel supporting the development would be subject to regulation under the chapter; permits cannot impose conditions on other portions of the parcel that do not support the development.
The committee discussed a forestry exemption that would prevent permitting authority over exempt portions of a parcel or tract devoted to logging and forestry and would limit Act 250 jurisdiction to the development area. The draft also addressed treatment of wood products manufacturers and added log and pulp concentration yards to that category.
🍁 Make a One-Time Contribution — Stand Up for Accountability in Vermont 🍁
On current-use taxation and agricultural definitions, staff described changes to the definition of agricultural land and the eligibility of farm buildings for current use enrollment. The draft would establish income thresholds and presumptions for agricultural use, including an example table: $2,000 of gross income for parcels up to 25 acres and $75 per acre over 25 acres with a total income threshold not to exceed $5,000. The tax department’s explanation included that farm buildings may be assessed at 0% of market value if the owner meets the statutory definition of farmer.
Fiscal impacts of current-use changes were discussed. Staff cited estimated statewide tax savings associated with current use at roughly $77.9 million in total tax savings, with municipal tax savings of $21.9 million and education property tax savings of $56 million. For a proposed expansion to include equine farming, a fiscal range was presented for fiscal year 2028 impacts between $4.6 million and $10 million, with part of that range attributable to increased general fund costs for municipal hold-harmless provisions and the remainder to reduced education property tax revenue.
Other Senate Finance items included a brief fiscal presentation on removing a discounted breeder license for domestic pets and wolf hybrids, which would shift those licensees into standard licensing with associated surcharges and would be minimally positive to municipalities and an animal sterilization special fund.
House Human Services (14:45) — reporting requirements and health provisions
House Human Services reviewed a package of health-related reporting changes and other statutory adjustments in bills including S.193 and H.293. The committee considered amendments to cancer registry disclosure rules that would allow the Commissioner of Health to accept written assurances acceptable to the commissioner — including institutional review board or privacy board approval — when disclosing protected health information for research, reflecting HIPAA-related requirements.
Committee staff reviewed proposed repeals and modifications of several reporting mandates. The Community Violence Prevention Program reporting language required by prior law was slated for removal; in place of earlier deadlines the draft maintained an annual reporting requirement but Health Department staff asked to move some report due dates to give time for data collection. The Department of Health requested streamlining of about 17 different reports to the legislature, saying data collection and public posting would continue while seeking to reduce or adjust mandated legislative reporting formats and schedules.
The committee also reviewed a new reporting requirement for recovery service organizations. The draft would require a written report by February 15 from the Department of Health in consultation with specified entities to policy committees detailing income and expenditures for recovery service organizations for fiscal years 2024–2026, public funding sources, recipients of funding, performance measures and recommendations for financial stability. House staff and witnesses discussed timing and definitional questions about which entities the report would cover.
House Agriculture, Food Resiliency & Forestry (11:40)
The House Agriculture committee considered H.941 (amendment 6.1) and related Senate language. Staff from the Office of Legislative Council walked members through amendments prohibiting municipal bylaws from regulating agricultural activities covered by required agricultural practices (RAPs), with limited exceptions for small-scale livestock operations and conditions for nutrient management on one- to four-acre operations. The amendment would allow performance standards for swine waste in downtown and village centers but would prohibit measures that effectively ban swine or swine waste in those areas. Members described the package as intended to protect farming and to respond to Supreme Court interpretations of legislative intent.
Institutions and Corrections committee items
Senate Institutions reviewed H.550 and H.74 addressing gender equity in professional facilities and telecommunication services and wages for incarcerated individuals; the committee discussed studies required by the bills and integration of Wi‑Fi considerations into telecommunication studies. House Corrections & Institutions discussed competency restoration services and the interim allowance of restoration services within correctional facilities pending establishment of a forensic facility, including a sunset provision timed to a forensic facility opening date.
Conclusion
The article covers May 14 committee hearings in Senate Finance, House Ways & Means, Senate Finance (earlier session), House Human Services, House Agriculture, and institutions-related committees. Lawmakers discussed tax provisions and administration, a mileage-based road usage charge and transition mechanics, forestry and current-use rules, reporting requirements for health and recovery programs, and related fiscal and authority issues across those committees.
FYIVTBOT | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Instagram
#fyivt #vtleg #goldendome #vermontpolitics
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Subscribe to RSS
Leave a Reply