Economic policy shapes everything from inflation to job growth, national debt, and government intervention. Two competing schools of thought—Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and Austrian Economics—offer starkly different visions for how the U.S. economy should function. Understanding these perspectives is crucial to making sense of economic debates, particularly regarding debt, taxation, and monetary policy. Additionally, the gold standard, a historical system tied to Austrian economics, offers insights into how money has been valued in the past.

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT): The Case for Unlimited Government Spending

MMT is a relatively new school of thought that challenges traditional concerns about government debt and deficits. Advocates argue that a country like the United States, which controls its own currency, can never run out of money—it can always print more dollars to meet its obligations.

Key Principles of MMT

1. Government Debt is Not Like Household Debt – Unlike individuals who must earn or borrow money, the U.S. government issues the currency that it spends. MMT theorists argue that deficits are not inherently bad, as they put money into the private sector, boosting economic activity.
2. Taxation Controls Inflation, Not Revenue Collection – Under MMT, taxes are not primarily used to fund government spending. Instead, they serve as a tool to manage inflation by reducing the amount of money in circulation.
3. Government Spending Should Focus on Full Employment – Since the government can print unlimited money, MMT supporters argue it should spend aggressively to eliminate unemployment and fund public programs without worrying about balancing the budget.
4. Inflation is the Only Constraint – The main risk of excessive government spending is inflation, but MMT theorists believe this can be controlled through taxation and other policy tools.

Criticism of MMT

Critics, including Austrian economists, argue that MMT ignores basic economic principles. Printing unlimited money may work in theory, but in practice, it devalues the currency and leads to runaway inflation (as seen in Venezuela or Zimbabwe). Austrian economists believe that governments should not manipulate the money supply so freely, as it distorts the natural functioning of markets.

Austrian Economics: The Free Market Solution

Austrian Economics, in contrast to MMT, is rooted in classical economic principles that emphasize limited government, sound money, and free-market capitalism. This school of thought, led by figures such as Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, argues that government intervention causes economic distortions, and that markets should operate freely with minimal regulation.

Key Principles of Austrian Economics

1. Government Should Not Control the Money Supply – Austrians believe that fiat money (government-issued currency not backed by a commodity) leads to inflation and economic instability. Instead, they advocate for a monetary system based on gold or other tangible assets.
2. Low Taxes and Limited Government Spending – The economy grows best when individuals and businesses control their own resources, rather than government directing economic activity through taxes and subsidies.
3. Business Cycles are Driven by Government and Central Banks – Austrians argue that recessions and booms are caused by artificial credit expansion by central banks. When interest rates are set too low, it leads to unsustainable booms followed by crashes (such as the 2008 financial crisis).
4. Deficits and Debt Weaken the Economy – Unlike MMT, Austrian economists believe that excessive government debt is dangerous, as it leads to higher inflation, weakens economic productivity, and ultimately results in financial crises.

Criticism of Austrian Economics

While Austrian economics is popular among libertarians and fiscal conservatives, critics argue that its strict free-market approach can lead to excessive economic inequality. They also contend that during major recessions or depressions, some government intervention is necessary to stabilize the economy.

The Gold Standard: A Monetary System That Restricts Government Control

One of the central ideas in Austrian economics is the gold standard, which was the foundation of U.S. monetary policy until 1971. Under the gold standard, paper money was directly tied to a fixed amount of gold, preventing governments from printing unlimited currency.

How the Gold Standard Worked

• Each dollar was backed by a certain quantity of gold, meaning people could exchange their paper money for physical gold.
• Governments could not engage in excessive deficit spending because they were limited by the amount of gold they had in reserve.
• The gold standard provided stability—it prevented wild inflation and currency manipulation.

Support FYIVT Today – Choose Your Impact! Name Your Own Price to Help Us Keep Fighting for Truth and Transparency. Every Contribution Makes a Difference!

Why the U.S. Abandoned the Gold Standard

President Richard Nixon officially ended the gold standard in 1971, moving the U.S. to a fiat currency system. The decision was made because:

1. The government wanted more flexibility – The gold standard made it difficult to print money to finance government programs and military spending.
2. Other countries were demanding U.S. gold reserves – Foreign nations were converting their U.S. dollars into gold, draining U.S. gold reserves.
3. Deflationary pressures – The gold standard sometimes restricted economic growth by limiting the money supply.

Consequences of Leaving the Gold Standard

• Increased Inflation – Since moving to fiat currency, the U.S. has experienced periods of significant inflation, particularly in the 1970s and again in recent years.
• Greater Government Control Over the Economy – The Federal Reserve now has much greater power to influence economic conditions through interest rates and money supply policies.
• Higher National Debt – Without gold backing, the U.S. government has been able to accumulate $34 trillion in national debt, a scenario that would not have been possible under a gold-backed system.

Which System Works Best?

The debate between MMT and Austrian Economics reflects broader ideological battles about government control versus free markets.

• MMT supporters argue that sovereign governments should spend freely to improve society and that the risks of inflation can be managed.
• Austrian economists argue that free markets and sound money (like gold) lead to long-term prosperity and that government intervention distorts economic stability.

While the gold standard provided stability, critics argue that it limited economic flexibility. Conversely, fiat currency allows governments to respond to crises, but also enables reckless spending and inflation.

Ultimately, the U.S. economy today operates under a fiat monetary system, with elements of MMT-style spending but also some free-market principles. Understanding these economic theories helps citizens navigate policy debates, inflation concerns, and government decisions that affect their financial well-being.

Conclusion

Modern Monetary Theory and Austrian Economics represent two fundamentally different approaches to managing an economy. While MMT emphasizes government spending and downplays concerns about debt, Austrian Economics calls for fiscal restraint, low taxes, and free markets. Meanwhile, the gold standard remains a historical reference for those who believe in sound money and limited government intervention. As economic challenges evolve, understanding these perspectives is essential for making informed policy decisions.

If you found this article informative and want to support independent journalism in Vermont, become a supporter for just $5/month today!

Dave Soulia | FYIVT

You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram

#fyivt #economicdebate #soundmoney #mmt

Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!

Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!

Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!