In recent years, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has dominated Vermont’s environmental policy agenda. Laws like the Global Warming Solutions Act (H.688) and the Clean Heat Standard (S.5) aim to slash emissions by 2050, prioritizing climate change mitigation over traditional air quality concerns. However, many Vermonters now question if these policies truly address the state’s core environmental issues—or if they primarily serve a broader, costly agenda.
Vermont’s Shift from Air Quality to Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Decades ago, Vermont’s environmental policies centered on air quality, tackling pollutants like sulfur dioxide and smog. Thanks to federal standards and Vermont’s smaller industrial footprint, the state’s air quality has improved significantly since the 1970s. Today, Vermont’s environmental focus has pivoted almost entirely to reducing GHG emissions, driven not only by concerns over climate change but also by funding opportunities, media emphasis, and peer pressure from other states and environmental organizations.
Federal and state grants are often allocated based on GHG reduction goals, incentivizing Vermont to align its policies with national and global priorities. Media coverage has consistently amplified the urgency of climate change, making GHG emissions a central issue in public discourse. Additionally, pressure to align with progressive environmental trends has influenced Vermont’s legislative priorities, as the state seeks to maintain its image as a leader in sustainability.
The Global Warming Solutions Act mandates an 80% reduction in emissions by 2050, while the Clean Heat Standard targets emissions from heating. Both laws aim to decrease Vermont’s carbon footprint but don’t directly address air pollutants still affecting Vermont due to sources outside the state, such as acid rain caused by distant industrial emissions. While GHG reductions are an important goal, some residents feel that this intense focus comes at the cost of addressing Vermont-specific environmental issues.
Adding to these concerns, there are ongoing discussions in Montpelier about introducing a new gas tax on top of the existing heating fuel tax. This proposal has sparked debate among residents and policymakers, with some arguing that it places an undue financial burden on Vermonters without effectively addressing the state’s unique environmental challenges. The potential impact of such a tax on both the economy and the environment remains a contentious issue, raising questions about whether these policies are the right approach for Vermont.
Research Spending vs. Direct Action
While the state has committed to GHG goals, much of Vermont’s funding has gone into research and planning rather than direct action. For example, the Vermont Climate Council, created by the GWSA, spent over $2 million in 2022 on developing a Climate Action Plan that included extensive research, engagement, and administrative costs (EPA GIS Public Access). Millions more have been spent on feasibility studies for the Clean Heat Standard, without substantial reductions in emissions to date.
This funding could have been directed toward practical solutions. For instance, the $2 million spent on planning could have instead provided direct subsidies for home weatherization, helping residents lower energy use and reduce heating costs. Though modest compared to larger initiatives, such direct subsidies would likely offer more immediate, tangible benefits to Vermonters than further studies and reports—or the state could simply have chosen not to spend that money, which might have lowered taxes on citizens by about $2 million.
A Disproportionate Focus
Vermont contributes only about 0.015% of global GHG emissions (State of Global Air), yet current policies place a heavy burden on residents to meet ambitious targets. While Vermont is aligned with global climate agendas, it lacks a proportionate impact on emissions. Furthermore, pollution sources affecting the state, like acid rain, originate beyond Vermont’s borders, meaning local GHG reductions won’t resolve these issues.
The emphasis on state-level GHG policies that mirror national objectives raises concerns about whether Vermont is prioritizing the environmental needs that truly impact its residents.
Conclusion: Time to Reassess Vermont’s Priorities
In light of the 2024 election results, it may be time for Vermont’s legislature to reconsider its approach. The Global Warming Solutions Act (H.688), while well-intentioned, has directed resources into research without delivering measurable results. Given Vermont’s small share of global emissions, repealing the GWSA could allow the state to reassess its environmental strategy.
Repealing the GWSA would give lawmakers an opportunity to refocus on Vermont’s unique environmental needs—whether addressing regional air quality, water health, or other localized issues. Setting realistic, impactful priorities could ensure that Vermont’s resources address its specific environmental challenges without imposing undue costs on residents.
Dave Soulia | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram
#fyivt #FoodSafety #RawMilk #ConsumerChoice
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Leave a Reply