When Americans talk about immigration, they often invoke a romantic image of Ellis Island: hopeful families gazing at the Statue of Liberty, stepping onto U.S. soil to build a better life. But the reality of that era was far less idyllic—and arguably stricter—than the policies being enforced today.
Between 1892 and 1954, Ellis Island served as the main processing station for more than 12 million immigrants. Far from an open-door policy, the process was a gauntlet. Immigrants were subject to medical examinations, interrogations, and financial scrutiny. Anyone found to be sick, disabled, impoverished, or likely to become a “public charge” could be detained or deported on the spot.
No Green Card, No Welfare, No Entry
Immigration law in the Ellis Island era wasn’t just about letting people in—it was about keeping the “wrong” people out. The Immigration Act of 1882 explicitly denied entry to “any convict, lunatic, idiot, or any person unable to take care of himself or herself without becoming a public charge.” This was followed by the Chinese Exclusion Act, the literacy test of 1917, and the racial quota system of the 1924 Immigration Act—all designed to filter not just how many, but which immigrants could enter.
There was no welfare state cushioning the landing. The idea that immigrants would arrive and immediately receive taxpayer-funded housing, food, and medical care would have been unthinkable in the early 20th century. Instead, newcomers were expected to fend for themselves or rely on relatives, churches, or ethnic communities—not federal assistance.
And those who couldn’t make it? They were sent back. Of the approximately 12 million processed at Ellis Island, over 250,000 were turned away and returned to their countries of origin—often in debt from the voyage. The U.S. government made it clear: immigration was a privilege, not a right.
Then and Now: The Enforcement Gap
Fast-forward to today, and the contrast is stark. The U.S. immigration system is now a labyrinth of agencies, humanitarian exceptions, backlogged courts, and inconsistent enforcement. While Customs and Border Protection still screens for health concerns, deportations for illness or poverty are rare. Many unauthorized foreign nationals now claim asylum regardless of merit, are released into the interior, and are often eligible for housing subsidies, healthcare, or schooling—at public expense.
To be clear, not all immigrants today seek or receive public assistance. But the system has shifted away from the older model of self-sufficiency toward one that tolerates long-term dependence, particularly in sanctuary jurisdictions. The public charge rule has been rewritten multiple times in recent decades, narrowing its scope and loosening requirements.
What’s more, the very act of enforcing immigration law is now labeled by some as “cruel” or “authoritarian,” even when the same policies were used in the past by presidents across the political spectrum.
History’s Forgotten Crackdowns
For those who claim today’s enforcement efforts are unprecedented, history tells a different story. During the Great Depression, immigration policy hardened even further. Under President Herbert Hoover, mass deportations began in earnest. Facing massive unemployment, Hoover’s administration quietly orchestrated the deportation of at least 100,000 Mexicans—many of them U.S. citizens by birth—in what’s now referred to as the Mexican Repatriation. Local officials and immigration agents conducted sweeps, raids, and coerced repatriations without due process.
Franklin D. Roosevelt, who succeeded Hoover, did not halt the practice. In fact, the deportations continued well into the New Deal years. Roosevelt’s Immigration and Naturalization Service maintained quotas and enforced the “public charge” rule with vigor. By 1939, FDR’s administration had deported more than 120,000 people in a single year.
No mass protests. No social media outcry. No calls for impeachment. The political consensus at the time was clear: in hard times, immigrants had to prove they could contribute—or leave.
🍁 Make a One-Time Contribution — Stand Up for Accountability in Vermont 🍁
Obama, Trump, and the New Double Standard
Compare that with the uproar during Barack Obama’s presidency, despite his administration deporting over 3 million people—more than any previous president. Known among immigrant advocacy groups as the “Deporter-in-Chief,” Obama prioritized the removal of criminals, recent border crossers, and repeat immigration violators. Yet, few on the left viewed his policies as fascist or xenophobic at the time.
Donald Trump, using many of the same statutes and executive tools as Obama, faced a firestorm of criticism for enforcing the same laws. His efforts to build a physical barrier, reinstate the public charge rule, and detain unauthorized migrants pending court hearings were labeled as draconian—even when the courts ultimately upheld much of the policy.
The Real Lesson of Ellis Island
The takeaway is not that America should revert to a bygone era of exclusion and arbitrary quotas. But it’s worth dispelling the myth that today’s immigration climate is uniquely harsh or un-American. If anything, the Ellis Island generation faced far stricter requirements, with far fewer rights and no fallback safety net.
What has changed is not the law—it’s the narrative. Immigration enforcement used to be seen as a basic function of sovereignty. Today, it’s a political third rail. But the core challenge remains the same: how to balance compassion with the rule of law, and opportunity with responsibility.
The Ellis Island era wasn’t open borders. It was conditional welcome. And if we’re honest about our history, we’ll admit that expecting immigrants to be healthy, law-abiding, and self-sufficient isn’t a betrayal of American values—it’s how this country was built.
Dave Soulia | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram
#fyivt #EllisIslandTruth #ImmigrationHistory #ThenAndNow
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Subscribe to RSS
Leave a Reply