Arrest. Release. Repeat.

Arrest. Release. Repeat.

Throughout Vermont, frustration with the revolving-door criminal justice system is growing. While law enforcement diligently arrests offenders, prosecutors and courts repeatedly release individuals back into the community, even those with long criminal histories. This problem is particularly evident in Chittenden County, where lenient policies echo those in New York, where criminal justice reforms have led to significant rises in crime rates. Vermont faces a similar situation unless changes are made to hold offenders accountable.

The Impact of Lenient Prosecution

In Vermont, an increase in property crimes and drug-related offenses is disproportionately driven by repeat offenders. Despite multiple arrests, many offenders are released and re-offend within hours. Vermont’s struggles with lenient prosecution mirror those of New York, where bail reforms resulted in a spike in violent crimes (source). Vermonters are sharing videos of criminal activity on social media, shining a light on the frequency of these offenses. Yet, elected officials have been slow to address the growing public safety crisis.

Vermont’s Criminal Courts: Accountability Lacking

The revolving-door nature of Vermont’s criminal courts, especially in Chittenden County, has led to a lack of accountability for offenders. Courts and prosecutors have adopted a restorative justice approach that emphasizes rehabilitation over incarceration. However, this method is failing to curb the actions of repeat offenders, who continue to cycle through the system without facing significant consequences. Without proper deterrents, these offenders feel empowered to reoffend, knowing the system offers minimal repercussions. Read more about Vermont’s revolving-door justice system.

Law Enforcement’s Frustrations

Vermont’s law enforcement officers are increasingly frustrated with the lack of support from prosecutors and judges. While police diligently arrest individuals involved in crimes, many offenders are back on the streets within hours, thanks to lenient prosecution. This lack of follow-through undermines the police’s efforts and erodes public trust in the justice system. For example, in Burlington, crime has surged, leaving residents and business owners feeling vulnerable. As a result, law enforcement is calling for stricter policies to ensure repeat offenders face appropriate penalties (source).

The Cost to Vermont Communities

The revolving-door criminal justice system is having a devastating impact on Vermont’s communities. Small businesses, in particular, are struggling with the costs of repeated theft and property damage. These crimes, often committed by the same individuals, not only hurt the bottom line but also contribute to a sense of lawlessness. Residents feel increasingly unsafe in their neighborhoods, and the perception that offenders face no serious consequences adds to a growing atmosphere of insecurity. The financial strain on communities includes rising insurance costs and a decreased willingness of businesses to invest in areas where crime is rampant.

In Burlington, the surge in crime has severely impacted local businesses and contributed to a decline in public safety. Reports show that both residents and business owners are concerned about the lack of accountability for offenders, fearing that the situation will only worsen without stronger policies in place (source).

Support FYIVT Today – Choose Your Impact! Name Your Own Price to Help Us Keep Fighting for Truth and Transparency. Every Contribution Makes a Difference!

Proposed Solutions for Vermont’s Criminal Justice System

To address the growing issue of repeat offenders and ensure public safety, several reforms are necessary:

  1. Stricter Penalties for Repeat Offenders: Vermont needs to impose tougher penalties on individuals who continually re-offend. Escalating penalties for those with multiple offenses would act as a deterrent and prevent further criminal activity.
  2. Improved Coordination Between Police and Prosecutors: Law enforcement and prosecutors need to work together to ensure that arrests lead to successful prosecutions and that penalties reflect the severity of the crimes committed. Without such coordination, police efforts are wasted when offenders are released with minimal or no consequences.
  3. Reevaluate Restorative Justice: While restorative justice is a valuable tool for first-time offenders, it should not be the default for repeat offenders. For those who show a consistent pattern of re-offending, harsher penalties are needed to ensure public safety.
  4. Community Engagement and Support: Business owners, residents, and local leaders must demand greater accountability from the justice system. Collaborative efforts are essential to foster a safer community while supporting crime prevention and rehabilitation programs.

Conclusion: Time for a Justice System Overhaul

Vermont’s criminal justice system needs immediate reform to restore public trust and protect communities from repeat offenders. While restorative justice has its place, public safety should not be sacrificed in the name of rehabilitation. Prosecutors, judges, and courts must adopt a more balanced approach that holds offenders accountable while still exploring avenues for rehabilitation. Vermont’s communities deserve a justice system that prioritizes their safety, deters crime, and ensures that offenders face real consequences for their actions.

Dave Soulia | FYIVT

You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram

#fyivt #JusticeReform #PublicSafety #VermontCrime

Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!

Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!

Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!


Discover more from FYIVT

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

admin Avatar

One response to “Arrest. Release. Repeat.”

  1. KJ McIlveen Avatar

    When I worked for Corrections we used to call it “Catch and Release”, just as in fishing.
    In the jails and on the streets the inmates are running the show. They know there is no accountability for criminal behavior. I was given strict instructions when someone on a release to the community and reoffended that the heads of the department were going to make the ultimate decision whether to release the person to await trial or ignore their positive drug/drink testing because incarceration was “too expensive” or the jails are “full”. This new wave of behavioral control started in about 2015.

Leave a Reply

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

By signing up, you agree to the our terms and our Privacy Policy agreement.