Did you elect your representative to tell you to run for your life when faced with danger? Isn’t it the government’s primary responsibility to ensure your safety? At its core, this responsibility includes protecting your right to defend yourself, your loved ones, and your home.
Yet in Vermont, current self-defense laws often prioritize retreat over resistance, placing the burden of safety and responsibility on the victims rather than aggressors. While Vermont courts have adhered somewhat to Castle Doctrine principles—allowing individuals to defend themselves in their homes without retreat—the lack of clear statutory protections creates uncertainty for victims and hesitation in moments of crisis. Meanwhile, criminals face no such ambiguity. Should you be forced to abandon your home, where you and your family are meant to feel safe, simply because the state doesn’t explicitly protect your right to stand your ground? These questions challenge the very foundation of our state’s commitment to individual security and justice.
In much of the world, and many states across the U.S., self-defense is seen as a fundamental right. Governments recognize the sanctity of one’s home as a place that must be defended—not surrendered. Vermont, however, relies on subjective standards like “reasonableness” and “necessity,” leaving its citizens uncertain about their rights in life-threatening situations. Without clear statutory protections, Vermonters are left vulnerable, unsure whether their actions in self-defense will be supported or punished.
A Brief History of Self-Defense Law in Vermont
The Early Years
Vermont’s self-defense laws have their roots in common law principles, which emphasize the necessity and proportionality of force. However, these principles often require individuals to retreat if a reasonable and sufficient means of avoiding conflict is available. This retreat doctrine, while intended to reduce violence, places an undue burden on victims to prioritize escape over self-protection.
Notable Cases
- State v. Rounds (1932): The Vermont Supreme Court ruled that deadly force is justified only if the individual reasonably believes they are in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and no reasonable means of avoidance exist. This decision firmly established Vermont’s expectation that individuals must retreat if possible.
- State v. Hatcher (1997): While this case reaffirmed that deadly force may be used when retreat is not a reasonable option, it also underscored the absence of a codified “Stand Your Ground” principle in Vermont law.
These cases demonstrate Vermont’s restrictive approach to self-defense, which leaves its citizens to navigate a murky legal landscape in moments of crisis. The absence of clear statutory guidance creates a framework where Vermonters are expected to second-guess their decisions, even when their lives are at stake.
Is It Time for Modernization?
Despite Vermont’s relatively low crime rate in years past, recent increases in violent crime, home invasions, and property theft underscore the need to revisit and strengthen the state’s self-defense laws. The existing framework, while functional, lacks the clarity, precision, and robustness necessary to protect citizens in today’s environment.
Key Areas for Improvement
- Codifying the Right to Stand One’s Ground:
Vermont’s “no duty to retreat” principle exists largely through case law, leaving citizens uncertain about their legal rights when confronted by a threat. - Expanding Protections for Property Defense:
Current statutes do not adequately address scenarios like home invasions, carjackings, or forcible removal, leaving residents vulnerable and unsure of their legal options. - Providing Immunity from Prosecution and Civil Suits:
Vermont law does not explicitly shield individuals from legal retaliation after acting in lawful self-defense, creating financial and emotional burdens for those who protect themselves or their families. - Clarity and Accessibility:
Clear statutory language reduces the potential for prosecutorial overreach, ensuring that lawful acts of self-defense are not subject to subjective interpretation.
A Hypothetical Vermont Stand Your Ground Act
AN ACT RELATING TO STRENGTHENING THE RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE
Purpose:
To provide clarity and assurance to Vermont citizens regarding their legal right to use force, including deadly force, in defense of themselves, their families, and their property, without an obligation to retreat when they are lawfully present.
Section 1: Title
This act shall be known and cited as the “Vermont Stand Your Ground Act.”
Section 2: Legislative Findings
The General Assembly finds that:
- Citizens have a fundamental right to defend themselves against unlawful threats of violence.
- The principle of self-defense is deeply rooted in Vermont’s values of individual liberty and personal responsibility.
- A clear and codified self-defense law will promote public safety and provide confidence to law-abiding citizens while deterring criminal activity.
Section 3: Use of Force in Defense of Persons
(a) Use of Non-Deadly Force:
A person is justified in using or threatening to use non-deadly force against another when the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend themselves or others against the imminent use of unlawful force.
(b) Use of Deadly Force:
A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if:
- They reasonably believe that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death, serious bodily harm, or the commission of a forcible felony against themselves or others; and
- The person is not engaged in unlawful activity and is in a place where they have a lawful right to be.
Section 4: No Duty to Retreat
A person who is lawfully present in any location has no duty to retreat before using force, including deadly force, as authorized under Section 3.
Section 5: Defense of Property
(a) A person is justified in using or threatening to use non-deadly force to prevent or terminate another’s unlawful entry or attack upon their dwelling, vehicle, or property.
(b) A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if:
- The intruder has unlawfully entered, is in the process of unlawfully entering, or is attempting to forcibly remove a person against their will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
- The person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm.
Section 6: Immunity from Prosecution and Civil Actions
(a) Criminal Immunity:
A person who uses force as permitted under this Act shall not be subject to criminal prosecution for such use of force.
(b) Civil Immunity:
A person who uses force as permitted under this Act shall not be held liable in a civil action brought by the aggressor or their representatives for injuries or damages resulting from the use of such force.
(c) If a court finds that the defendant is immune under this section, the court shall award reasonable attorney fees, court costs, and compensation for loss of income to the defendant.
Section 7: Exceptions
This Act does not apply if:
- The person against whom force was used was a lawful resident or occupant and was not engaged in unlawful activity.
- The person using force was engaged in criminal activity or using their dwelling, vehicle, or property to further criminal activity.
- Force was used against a law enforcement officer acting in the lawful performance of their duties and the person knew or reasonably should have known the individual was a law enforcement officer.
Section 8: Definitions
For purposes of this Act:
- “Deadly force” means force that is intended or known by the user to cause, or in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing, death or serious bodily injury.
- “Forcible felony” includes but is not limited to murder, robbery, burglary, and aggravated assault.
- “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, whether temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, that is designed to be occupied by people for lodging.
Section 9: Severability
If any provision of this Act or its application is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the Act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this Act are severable.
Section 10: Effective Date
This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2025.
Does Vermont Need a Stand Your Ground Law?
- Rising Crime Rates:
Recent increases in violent crime and property theft demonstrate a growing need for clear self-defense laws that empower law-abiding citizens. - Deterrence of Criminal Activity:
Codifying robust self-defense rights sends a strong message to would-be offenders that Vermont residents will not be easy targets. - Legal and Financial Protection for Victims:
By granting immunity from prosecution and civil suits, the proposed law removes the fear of legal retaliation for those forced to defend themselves. - A Balanced Approach:
The bill strikes a careful balance, providing robust protections for citizens while excluding individuals engaged in criminal activity or acts of aggression. - Alignment with Public Sentiment:
In an era where personal safety feels increasingly uncertain, this legislation reassures Vermonters that the state values their right to defend themselves and their families.
Could Vermont Benefit from a Law Like This?
The Vermont Stand Your Ground Act represents a potential solution to modernize and clarify the state’s self-defense laws, empowering law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families without hesitation. Do you believe this hypothetical bill could address Vermont’s rising concerns about safety and self-defense?
If this idea resonates with you, why not start a conversation? Share this article with your elected officials and ask them where they stand on Vermont’s current self-defense laws. Are they working to ensure that Vermonters can feel safe and secure in their homes, or do they believe the current “Run For Your Lives” framework is sufficient?
Discussions like these can help bring attention to the need for clear, fair, and protective laws that reflect the values of our state and its people. Together, Vermonters can help shape a safer and more secure future.
Dave Soulia | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram
#fyivt #selfdefense #vermontlaw #standyourground
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Leave a Reply