Lawmakers weigh school construction exclusion, budget transfers, renewables definition and health coverage changes across committees
Education
Members of the House Education Committee considered H.750, a bill introduced by Rep. Charlie Kimble to exclude capital construction costs from the statutory definition of education spending used to calculate excess spending. Committee discussion cited the bill’s two core purposes: removing bond payments from excess spending calculations and deeming "good cause" to commence construction before final approval under the State Aid for School Construction program tied to Act 73, Act 68 and Act 60. Testimony detailed local construction proposals, including a $111,000,000 project and prior bond votes, and presented illustrative per‑property penalty calculations under current excess‑spending rules when bond payments are included and excluded.
Officials and counsel explained the bill’s limited drafting approach aimed at addressing current disincentives while acknowledging uncertainties about future program administration under the state aid framework scheduled to take effect July 1, 2026.
Ways & Means
House Ways & Means members reviewed budget and tax materials, including proposals and statutory language tied to S.2, S.600 and S.13 and to Act 73. Staff presented a general fund revenue overview showing a top‑line of 2,533,000,000 and noted an $8.5 million downgrade by the Economic Board for FY27. Committee discussion described use of prior‑year reserves and contingent appropriations: $30,000,000 being unreserved and $74,900,000 carried forward from the FY26 budget adjustment, with those sums directed to the education fund for property tax relief. Members also discussed an approximately $115,000,000 total transfer to the education fund resulting from several adjustments, including removal of motor vehicle purchase and use tax receipts from the education fund to transportation.
The committee reviewed implementation steps from a December 15 tax department report required under Act 73 and discussed placeholder statutory language for classification changes, including definitions of homestead and long‑term rental and mixed‑use parcel treatment. Officials flagged policy questions about data collection, municipal roles, and funding for classification work.
Staff described a statutory transfer to the Computer Modernization Fund under 32 VSA as an annual mechanism tied to a percentage of prior‑year revenue; the FY27 appropriation request for the fund was presented as $6,397,000 with a proposed transfer of about $6,200,000.
Appropriations
House Appropriations presentations outlined a governor’s recommended budget totaling $9,343,823, representing a 5.7% increase over the prior year. Agency briefs described budget drivers, personnel and program changes, and targeted one‑time and ongoing requests. The department highlighted internal service fund activity tied to a new financial management (vision) fund and VTHR payroll system, noting a roughly $14 million internal service fund and associated allocation formulas.
Appropriations staff discussed several program‑level items for committee consideration, including a proposed $50,000 one‑time general fund request in H.577 to support outreach and marketing for a pharmacy discount card program and a $75,000 request for actuarial services related to a pension task force. Officials described pension funding and amortization concerns tied to statutory timelines for fully funding liabilities.
The department also briefed the committee on implementation and reporting changes connected to new budget and financial systems, and on internal service fund allocations and anticipated impacts to agency operating expenses.
🍁 Make a One-Time Contribution — Stand Up for Accountability in Vermont 🍁
Energy & Digital Infrastructure
The Energy & Digital Infrastructure Committee reviewed H.710, which would amend the statutory definition of "plant" used across renewable energy programs and cited the Public Utility Commission’s report and prior S.50 work. Counsel and stakeholders described longstanding disputes about whether adjacent facilities constitute a single plant for program caps and incentives, and discussed implications for co‑location, standard offer and net metering projects. The committee heard that the bill carries mandate and penalty elements and that the PUC recommended changes to definitions and to decommissioning processes; opponents and industry groups said work continues to refine decommissioning language.
Utility testimony addressed resilience and grid investments, including assets and storage, as well as estimates tying incremental savings or costs to rate impacts.
Health Care
The House Health Care Committee heard multiple stakeholder presentations on association health plans and other health insurance reforms referenced in S.12 and S.15. Witnesses described association health plans as a potential tool to expand employer coverage options and provide cost relief for some small employers and nonprofits, and urged guardrails and consumer protections. Testimony highlighted how shifts in small‑group participation and availability of premium tax credits interact with market dynamics and individual affordability. Officials noted broader market volatility and urged consideration of multiple policy tools.
General & Housing
The General & Housing Committee examined zoning and grant issues affecting mobile home parks and limited equity cooperatives. Testimony outlined program eligibility and tax filing consequences for cooperatives that receive grants, including income‑test thresholds and potential impacts on tax filing status under IRS forms. Witnesses discussed municipal zoning processes, statutory requirements for planning and grant competition, and concerns about project timelines and municipal capacity for plan adoption.
Environment
The Environment Committee reviewed provisions expanding agency discretion and rulemaking authority. Agency testimony described proposed additions to authorizations for the Secretary of ANR to require CAFO permits under residual designation authority and a requested change to emergency rulemaking authority with a sunset of July 1, 2028. Members discussed river corridor mapping deadlines and related permit and outreach requirements, and wetlands rule items including a state net‑gain mitigation policy and revised thresholds for disturbance. Stakeholders flagged workload, implementation timing and costs tied to staffing for rule development.
Judiciary, Commerce, Corrections and other panels
Judiciary committee sessions addressed revisions to statutes on voyeurism, sexual extortion and interference with voters and election officials, with drafters proposing new sections, definitional changes and enhanced penalties in some circumstances; committee counsel and prosecutors discussed mens rea elements and penalty structures. Commerce & Economic Development reviewed bills including H.205 on noncompete agreements and H.211 and S.25 on data privacy and data broker registration, with debates over registration timelines, deletion mechanisms, enforcement and potential business impacts. Corrections & Institutions discussed dam classification and related capital and assessment projects and cost estimates.
Conclusion
This article summarizes committee sessions and testimony recorded on January 28, 2026, across House committees including Education, Ways & Means, Appropriations, Energy & Digital Infrastructure, Health Care, General & Housing, Environment, Judiciary, Commerce & Economic Development, and Corrections & Institutions. Topics covered included H.750 on school construction and excess‑spending treatment, budget transfers and tax classification work tied to Act 73, appropriations and internal service fund changes, renewable energy facility definitions in H.710, association health plan discussions, zoning and grant tax consequences for mobile home cooperatives, and environmental rulemaking authority and permitting.
FYIVTBOT | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Instagram
#fyivt #vtleg #goldendome #vermontpolitics
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Subscribe to RSS
Leave a Reply