In the world of food names, few inspire more double-takes than rapeseed. The word, to modern English ears, sounds almost comically ill-chosen. Yet the origin is entirely innocent. The name comes from the Latin rapum, meaning turnip. For centuries, rapeseed was grown across Europe as part of the mustard and cabbage family, and its oil was used sparingly in lamps, lubricants, and in some rural kitchens.
The problem wasn’t the name alone. Traditional rapeseed oil was high in erucic acid, a compound linked to health risks if consumed in large amounts. That limited its use as a food product. In small, occasional doses, it was probably harmless, but as a staple, it was never embraced.
Branding a New Oil
The turning point came in the 1970s. Canadian agricultural researchers bred new varieties of rapeseed with dramatically lower levels of erucic acid and glucosinolates, making the oil far more palatable for human consumption. They gave it a fresh identity: canola, short for “Canadian oil, low acid.”
The rebrand was no accident. Selling “rapeseed oil” in supermarkets was never going to work. Canola sounded neutral, modern, even vaguely wholesome. It echoed other mid-20th-century food branding triumphs such as SPAM, a name Hormel invented in the 1930s to sell canned pork shoulder. SPAM, officially short for “spiced ham,” managed to avoid the unappealing image of “compressed meat scraps in a tin.” Canola did the same for turnip seed oil.
Both products also had state or industry backing. SPAM rose to prominence as military rations during World War II. Canola was promoted with government and industry support as a heart-healthy alternative to butter and lard during the cholesterol-obsessed era of the 1980s and 1990s. In both cases, branding and policy made the product a staple far more than taste did.
How Canola Oil Is Made
If the name change was clever, the production process was all industry. To produce refined canola oil, seeds are first crushed and pressed. But that doesn’t extract all the oil. To squeeze out the last 10 to 15 percent, processors bathe the seed meal in hexane, a petroleum-based solvent. The crude oil is then refined, bleached, and deodorized through high-heat treatment that strips away flavors, colors, and natural compounds.
By the time the process is complete, what’s left is a pale, neutral oil with a long shelf life and little character. It’s precisely what the food industry wanted — an inexpensive, flavorless fat that could be poured into fryers, bottled for consumers, and blended invisibly into everything from salad dressings to baked goods.
Critics argue this very neutrality is the problem. An oil that requires solvents, bleaching agents, and deodorizing to become edible hardly inspires confidence as a nourishing food. And while regulators say residual hexane levels are negligible, skeptics note that the refining process produces oxidized lipids and trace trans fats that aren’t found in traditional fats like butter, tallow, or olive oil.
🍁 Make a One-Time Contribution — Stand Up for Accountability in Vermont 🍁
The Health Debate
Canola’s defenders point to its favorable fatty acid profile: relatively high in monounsaturated fat and containing a modest amount of plant-based omega-3 (alpha-linolenic acid). Compared to shortening or margarine, canola oil does lower LDL cholesterol. That’s why it won endorsement from organizations like the American Heart Association.
But nutrition science has moved on. The more pressing concern today isn’t cholesterol alone, but inflammation and metabolic health. Canola oil, like other industrial seed oils, is rich in omega-6 linoleic acid. In modest amounts, that’s fine. In the vast quantities present in the modern food supply, it tilts the body’s omega-6 to omega-3 ratio toward chronic low-grade inflammation. Add in the fact that refined canola oil begins to break down when heated above about 400°F, and its use in deep frying becomes questionable.
In other words: the oil isn’t inherently poisonous, but in the sheer volume consumed today, it may contribute to the very chronic conditions it was once marketed to prevent.
Flavor: The Missing Ingredient
Beyond health debates, there’s the simple question of taste. Butter brings nuttiness and richness. Lard yields flaky pastries and savory depth. Tallow produces fries with legendary beefy flavor. Cold-pressed olive oil is fragrant with peppery bite.
Canola oil, by design, offers none of this. Its strength is invisibility. That made it a perfect fit for the processed-food boom of the late 20th century. But it also means home cooks rarely praise its flavor. If anything, it’s the oil you reach for when you don’t want to notice the oil at all.
The Industrial Meal
Taken together, the story of canola oil is a case study in how agriculture, chemistry, marketing, and government guidelines can reshape the dinner table. What began as a turnip-seed oil with an unfortunate name was rebranded, re-engineered, and promoted into ubiquity.
Yet the irony remains: the very engineering that made canola oil acceptable — its neutrality, its scalability, its “health halo” — also made it one of the most industrial products in the kitchen. Unlike butter, lard, or olive oil, it carries no cultural heritage of flavor or tradition.
And that leads to one last thought experiment. If SPAM represents the peak of industrial meat branding, and canola oil represents the peak of industrial fat processing, then perhaps the most industrial meal imaginable is the simplest: a slice of SPAM, sizzling away in a pan of canola oil.
Dave Soulia | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Instagram
#fyivt #FoodHistory #CanolaOil #SPAM
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Subscribe to RSS
Leave a Reply