In the chaotic lead-up to the upcoming “No Kings” rallies, it’s hard not to notice how conveniently timed the recent incident involving Senator Alex Padilla appears—especially when paired with the commentary that followed from Rep. Becca Balint and Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Padilla, according to video footage and still images, was physically removed from a Department of Homeland Security press conference after entering the space, advancing toward the podium, and resisting security efforts to stop him. While his own motivations have been explained as a scheduled meeting with military personnel in the building, the public focus has been less about what actually occurred, and more about how others chose to spin it.
The Theatrics of Outrage
Rep. Becca Balint called the incident “authoritarianism,” claiming there’s “no other word” to describe the physical removal of a sitting senator. Sanders went further, likening it to an “assault” by “federal agents” and dragging the event into the realm of American Revolution metaphors, promising we’ll “defeat King Donald.”
But watch the footage. The senator wasn’t seated. He wasn’t calm. He wasn’t raising a hand to ask a question. He was moving forward—past the press line, toward the podium—ignoring commands, resisting redirection, and eventually requiring multiple security officers to guide him out.
These weren’t optics of oppression. They were the consequences of ignoring protocol at a federal security event.
What We Actually Know
The DHS event was publicly scheduled and press-accessible that morning. Padilla’s own official channels—press releases, social media, newsletters—made no mention of a military meeting. No corresponding DoD statement announced a scheduled briefing with him either.
Could he have had a private briefing arranged? It’s possible. But if he did, there’s still no public documentation showing it, and his presence in the exact same room, within feet of the DHS Secretary’s podium, at the exact moment the press conference was underway, is… convenient.
Rules, Law, and the Limits of Truth
What laws or rules apply in a case like this?
Padilla may have run afoul of federal restrictions on access to secure government facilities during protected events (18 USC §1752), and possibly even laws about obstructing federal officers (18 USC §111), depending on the degree of resistance. However, as a sitting senator, the likelihood of prosecution is slim, and no official statements from DHS or DOJ have indicated they’ll pursue charges.
As for the narrative afterward?
Here’s where things get interesting: There is no rule—none whatsoever—that prohibits members of Congress from knowingly misleading the public. Unless they’re under oath, submitting a sworn document, or involved in a financial or legal filing, members of Congress can spin, stretch, and outright fabricate in front of cameras and microphones. And many do.
Padilla and Sanders are both bound by the Senate’s Code of Official Conduct, while Balint is bound by the House’s equivalent rules. These codes set broad expectations—such as avoiding conflicts of interest, not using one’s office for personal gain, and maintaining conduct that reflects creditably on Congress. But here’s the critical detail: neither chamber has a rule that prohibits members from knowingly misleading the public in press conferences, social media posts, or interviews. Unless a statement is made under oath, part of a sworn filing, or tied to misuse of official resources, a member of Congress can distort, spin, or outright fabricate a narrative without facing disciplinary consequences.
Escalation by Design?
What’s most troubling isn’t the press room scuffle—it’s what came after.
The public deserves clarity, calm, and truth from its elected officials—especially when political tensions are already running high. But instead of working to cool things down, the response from Sanders and Balint seemed carefully tuned to fan the flames. Not a call for context. Not a question about judgment. Just blanket outrage, inflammatory language, and accusations of authoritarianism.
With the “No Kings” protests just days away, this moment looks less like coincidence and more like choreography.
Final Thought
This doesn’t require a lawsuit. It doesn’t demand conspiracy theories. It just raises a simple, unsettling question: Are we being played?
Senator Padilla disrupted a DHS press conference. The video proves that. What followed wasn’t accountability—it was performance. And leading that performance were Rep. Becca Balint and Senator Bernie Sanders, who framed a clear security enforcement as “assault,” “authoritarianism,” and “tyranny.”
There’s no rule against misleading the public if you’re a member of Congress. There’s no penalty for mischaracterizing a security removal or fanning outrage with false claims. Maybe that’s the real problem.
If Rep. Balint and Senator Sanders are serious about protecting democracy, perhaps they should draft a rule—one that says members of Congress must not knowingly lie to the American people without consequence. Let’s see who votes for that.
Until then, we’re left with a strange reality: truth isn’t a requirement in Congress. But maybe it should be.
Dave Soulia | FYIVT
You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram
#fyivt #NoKings #PoliticalTheater #DHSBriefing
Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!
Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!
Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!
Subscribe to RSS
Leave a Reply