A viral Instagram video recently accused Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem of “funding private armed guards for ICE” and claimed that “mainstream media” ignored a scandal involving federal raids in Chicago. The clip spread quickly, shared as proof of government overreach. But after just a few minutes of verification, the claims fall apart — and the real story says more about media framing than about the federal agents in the air that night.

The Vermont view: helicopters aren’t a conspiracy

Here in Vermont, Black Hawk helicopters aren’t exactly exotic. When one passes overhead, most residents know that law enforcement is running a high-risk operation — typically drug interdiction, gang arrests, or fugitive recovery. The aircraft provide speed, overwatch, and safety for everyone involved. They’re loud, visible, and deliberate, but they’re also routine.

That context helps explain the disconnect. What looks like “militarization” to a social-media influencer unfamiliar with police work is simply how complex operations are conducted nationwide.

Protective details are nothing new

The viral video also accused Secretary Noem of “using taxpayer money to provide armed security for ICE agents.” That sounds explosive until you realize it’s been standard DHS and DOJ practice since the 1980s. When a credible threat is made against a federal agent — DEA, ATF, Marshals, Border Patrol, or ICE — a Protective Security Detail (PSD) is automatically authorized. The cost is covered through normal operational budgets, not political slush funds.

The U.S. Marshals Service pioneered the practice during the cartel wars of the late 1980s, and it remains the template for federal protective assignments today. In short, Secretary Noem didn’t invent anything; she followed the same procedure every administration has used for four decades when an officer’s life is threatened.

What actually happened in Chicago

According to the Department of Homeland Security press release issued October 6, agents from Homeland Security Investigations arrested Juan Espinoza Martinez, a Latin Kings gang member, in Burr Ridge, Illinois. Federal investigators had obtained Snapchat messages offering $2,000 for information on Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino and $10,000 “if you take him down.” The chat included “LK … on him,” identifying the Latin Kings.

Espinoza Martinez was charged with soliciting the murder of a senior federal officer. DHS credited its agents for stopping a potential assassination plot without a single shot fired. “Criminal gangs who threaten law enforcement will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” said Secretary Noem.

What the public was shown instead

The next day, PBS, with contributions from the AP, published “Immigration agents become increasingly aggressive in Chicago.” The piece described residents frightened by predawn helicopters and armed agents but left out why the raid occurred. There was no mention of Espinoza Martinez, no reference to the bounties, and no context that the operation was a direct response to a murder-for-hire plot. MSNBC linked to that story from a version of their own “The Chicago raids send a worrying signal about ideal ICE agents in Trump’s America“.

To an uninformed reader, it looked like ICE randomly storming an apartment complex. In reality, it was a precision federal takedown of a gang member accused of trying to pay for the killing of a U.S. Border Patrol chief.

What “mainstream media silence” really looked like

The influencer claimed that “no major media outlet” reported the story. That’s simply false.
A quick search shows CNN, Fox News, ABC 7, NBC 5 Chicago, WGN, Yahoo!, and MSN all ran pieces naming Espinoza Martinez, describing the $10,000 bounty, and citing the DHS release almost word-for-word. Local Illinois stations covered the raid on-air.

Only PBS, AP, and MSNBC shared the narrower “aggressive enforcement” articles without updating it once the federal details were public. So while some outlets minimized the assassination-plot angle, the story itself was widely covered across the mainstream press. The “media silence” claim doesn’t survive even a cursory Google search.

🍁 Make a One-Time Contribution — Stand Up for Accountability in Vermont 🍁

How misinformation multiplies

This is how online outrage machines operate. When major outlets omit key facts, influencers rush to fill the gap — usually with speculation and ideology. The Instagram video recycled partial truths: yes, a raid happened; yes, there were helicopters; but it twisted those facts into a narrative that federal agents had suddenly been assigned “private armed guards” funded by taxpayers.

The irony is that the outrage exists only because the fuller story was already public. The influencer didn’t discover a secret; she misunderstood an incomplete headline.

Journalism’s missing half

Good reporting can show both sides. Residents woken by helicopters have every right to be shaken. But omitting the reason those helicopters were there — a credible gang threat and an arrest made without casualties — misleads readers. A balanced account could have combined the emotional impact with the operational facts. Instead, audiences got fear without context.

When that happens, trust erodes. People turn to whoever sounds most certain, whether or not they’re credible. That’s how a standard DHS arrest becomes raw material for a viral conspiracy.

Why it looks different from Vermont

From here in Vermont, the scene makes sense. Black Hawks show up when dangerous people are being taken off the street. The community might grumble about the noise, but most recognize it as a sign that law enforcement is doing its job. If a similar raid happened over a Rutland apartment building and later turned out to involve gang members offering bounties to kill federal officers, most parents would likely feel relief, not resentment.

The takeaway

The Chicago operation was no mystery. DHS posted the facts before PBS or MSNBC went to print. Most mainstream outlets reported them accurately. Yet a few editorial choices — omitting motive, emphasizing optics — created an information vacuum that social-media outrage promptly filled.

The lesson is simple: before believing the loudest voice in your feed, read the source material. The truth was never hidden; it was just ignored.

If you found this information valuable and want to support independent journalism in Vermont, become a supporter for just $5/month today!

Dave Soulia | FYIVT

You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Instagram

#fyivt #FactCheck #MediaBias #JournalismMatters

Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!

Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!

Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!