Why Some Vermont Hospitals Are Thriving While Others Struggle to Stay Open

Why Some Vermont Hospitals Are Thriving While Others Struggle to Stay Open

Recent financial data from Vermont’s hospitals highlight a growing disparity in revenue distribution, with some hospitals posting surpluses while others are reporting significant losses. The University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC) reported a $62.6 million operating surplus, while hospitals such as Brattleboro Memorial Hospital (BMH) and Gifford Medical Center are operating at a loss, raising questions about the financial structure of Vermont’s healthcare system.

The Green Mountain Care Board (GMCB), which oversees hospital budgets and healthcare costs in the state, plays a key role in approving spending and reimbursement rates. Under 18 V.S.A. § 9375, GMCB has the authority to review and establish hospital budgets, regulate payment models, and oversee system-wide cost containment. Some policymakers and analysts have pointed to this authority as a potential tool to address financial disparities among Vermont hospitals.

Revenue Differences Among Hospitals

According to fiscal year reports, hospitals across Vermont saw varying financial results:

  • UVMMC’s net patient revenue exceeded projections by 2.88%, contributing to its $62.6 million surplus.
  • Brattleboro Memorial Hospital (BMH) and Gifford Medical Center reported operating margins of -5.1% and -18.2%, respectively.
  • Brattleboro Memorial Hospital reported just 33.5% of its revenue coming from private insurance, compared to UVMMC, which captures 31.3% of the state’s private insurance dollars.

Experts point to payer mix as a significant factor in the revenue gap. Hospitals that serve a higher percentage of Medicare and Medicaid patients tend to have lower reimbursement rates compared to those that receive a greater share of private insurance payments, which are typically higher.

Financial Pressures and Service Reductions in Rural Areas

While UVMMC continues to expand its network, some hospitals in rural or lower-income areas are being forced to cut services due to financial constraints.

  • Gifford Medical Center recently closed its urogynecology unit and chiropractic services in an effort to manage budget shortfalls.
  • Brattleboro Memorial Hospital has reported higher uncompensated care costs, limiting its ability to expand or maintain certain patient services.
  • Copley Hospital in Morrisville shut down its sleep disorders clinic and aquatic therapy pool, citing financial challenges.
  • Central Vermont Medical Center closed its inpatient psychiatry unit, reducing options for mental health care.

These cuts primarily affect less affluent, rural communities where alternative care options are limited. In some cases, patients may have to travel significant distances to access essential medical services, adding further burdens for those who already face economic challenges.

Support FYIVT Today – Choose Your Impact! Name Your Own Price to Help Us Keep Fighting for Truth and Transparency. Every Contribution Makes a Difference!

Possible Solutions: A More Balanced Approach

One concept under discussion is the possibility of a hospital stabilization fund, which would function as a state-managed mechanism to balance financial disparities between hospitals. Such a fund could allow hospitals with strong financial surpluses to contribute to those operating at a deficit, ensuring a more even distribution of resources and reducing the likelihood of service cuts in rural areas.

Additionally, some healthcare analysts have suggested adjusting reimbursement structures to ensure a more balanced financial landscape for Vermont’s hospitals. Others have pointed to the potential for restructuring private insurance payment models to ensure smaller hospitals receive a more sustainable share of high-reimbursement care.

Policy and Regulatory Considerations

The GMCB oversees hospital budgets and rate-setting but has not implemented major changes to reimbursement structures between large and small hospitals. Some policymakers have raised the question of whether a more balanced distribution of private insurance payments could help struggling hospitals maintain services, while others suggest that financial differences may stem from hospital efficiency, location, and patient volume.

As the state continues to monitor hospital financial health, discussions around private insurance reimbursement, service sustainability, and hospital funding distribution remain ongoing. The extent to which GMCB will utilize its statutory authority to address these disparities remains to be seen.

If you found this article informative and want to support independent journalism in Vermont, become a supporter for just $5/month today!

Dave Soulia | FYIVT

You can find FYIVT on YouTube | X(Twitter) | Facebook | Parler (@fyivt) | Gab | Instagram

#fyivt #VermontHealthcare #HospitalFunding #GMCB

Support Us for as Little as $5 – Get In The Fight!!

Make a Big Impact with $25/month—Become a Premium Supporter!

Join the Top Tier of Supporters with $50/month—Become a SUPER Supporter!


Discover more from FYIVT

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

admin Avatar

One response to “Why Some Vermont Hospitals Are Thriving While Others Struggle to Stay Open”

  1. […] healthcare system is facing significant financial challenges, with hospitals across the state struggling to remain solvent. Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood of […]

Leave a Reply

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

By signing up, you agree to the our terms and our Privacy Policy agreement.